Showing posts with label Japan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Japan. Show all posts

Friday, April 12, 2013

Walmart’s Wait & Watch Game

Wal-Mart is in no Hurry to up The Ante in India. The Retailer is Expanding and Strengthening its Wholesale Business, Hoping to Leverage those Strengths in The Future when Multi-Brand retail opens up.

These are interesting times for organised retail in India. Even more so for Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer and the largest listed company by revenue (roughly $422 billion in sales last year). The Bentonville, Arkansas-based Wal-Mart knows that India - which it entered in 2007 through a 50:50 joint venture with Bharti Enterprises - is critical to its ambition to further grow its lucrative global business. Already 26% of the company’s revenue comes from outside the US. Wal-Mart’s international business clocked more than $100 billion in revenue last year, expanding by more than 80% in the last five years.

Indubitably, India is a big pond for big fish Wal-Mart. But there’s a big catch. Wal-Mart’s strategy hasn’t really worked well outside the North and South American markets of Mexico, Brazil and Canada. In most major Asian and European markets like Germany, South Korea, Japan and China, Wal-Mart hasn’t exactly lived up to its formidable reputation as the world’s mightiest and meanest retailer. After entering Germany in 1997 through acquisitions, it exited the market in a jiffy in 2006 (less than a decade), owing to intense competition from the likes of Metro AG. Clearly, its brassy American ways failed to find favour with the Germans. A more or less similar set of circumstances forced it to close the doors on South Korea in 2006 (again, in less than a decade). In Japan, too, Wal-Mart has had a spotty performance so far, failing to live up to any lofty expectations. Its ELDP (Every day low price) scheme is not finding favour with the Japanese, who are ready to pay higher prices for quality. The story in China is not so happy either where its profits and sales are reportedly declining, creating survival issues for the company.

These developments have certainly dented Wal-Mart’s confidence, forcing a change in its strategy. The company is more cautious now about entering new markets. It has learnt its hard lessons. The aggressiveness - entering new markets by buying out local competition (like in Germany and South Korea) - is now tempered with a new-found mellowness and it now sees virtue in the wait-and-watch approach to new markets before taking the plunge.

Wizened to the ways of the new markets and armed with some hard-nosed learnings it entered India through an equal partnership. The logic was unimpeachable. A $1.3 trillion economy, with a 1.2 billion billion population, an expanding middle class (growing in riches and getting brand-conscious by day), India’s $450 billion retail industry is the fastest-growing sector of the economy with sales expected to grow at more than 30% till 2014. Yet, India remains one of the last untapped major retail markets (organised retail is less than 5%). In fact, among the 30 largest emerging markets, India ranks the third-most attractive, according to a recent report by consulting firm AT Kearney. Business Monitor International, a London-based agency in the field of industry research, says retail sales in the third-largest Asian economy might grow to $785 billion by 2015 from $396 billion in 2011 if FDI restrictions are eased soon. Currently, India limits overseas investment in single-brand outlets to 51% and 100% in cash-and-carry stores, which can only sell to other retailers and dealers. But most international retailers are gunning for opening up of the lucrative multi-brand retail, which the Indian government has vetoed so far fearing backlash from mom-and-pop store operators, who constitute 70-80% of the retail Indian market.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

K. R. KIM

The Vice Chairman & CEO, Videocon Industries (formerly LG India head), takes a break from company matters and talks to B&E’s Deputy Editor Virat Bahri, on his unique perspectives of how India and Korea can help each other achieve their objectives

B&E: You have been in India for the past 12 years. What is your view of the Indian economy’s transition and also about its future?
KRK:
For the next 30 years, India and China will play a big role; be it politically or economically. The challenge for China in the next 30 years will be how they can improve the political situation and how they can convert to a democratic country in a gradual and stable way and in a peaceful manner. For India, the challenge in the next 30 years will be how India can maintain a 8-9% GDP growth to get out of poverty. Which is easier? India’s challenge to grow continuously by 8-9% will be easier than China’s democratic transition. Political change is much more difficult. India did a good job post independence to maintain a democratic system; not a 100% perfect system, but who is perfect? India has a good foundation in its political system. Now it is the time for India to grow.

B&E: What are the similarities and differences between India and Korea as markets?
KRK:
All three countries (China, Korea and Japan) are built on military culture and discipline. Even the weather is very different. Winter is very cold in Korea. Climate also changes the people’s mindset. India is a semi-tropical area where most areas have very less winter. It means an easy life; and is good for philosophy! On the other hand, the key similarity is the mindset of being Asian. In Asian countries, basic philosophy is Buddhism. Hinduism and Buddhism are 90% similar. So philosophically they have a common ground.

B&E: India and Korea have signed a historic free trade agreement. How can the two countries leverage on each other’s strengths?
KRK:
If you see Korea and India, what Korea did in the last 30 years was hard culture development – manufacturing, discipline, product oriented. Korea improved a lot over the last 30 years. During the Korean war, Korea received aid from India. After that, Korea developed economically and did a good job of developing what I call hard culture. India developed soft culture in the last 30 years – democracy, software, content oriented. Now it’s time for Korea to inculcate India’s soft culture and India has to inculcate more of Korea’s hard culture. We cannot classify everything in that way, but this is to simplify the discussion. Without soft culture, Korea cannot become a high income country. Korea wants to go to around $40,000 income levels. But without improving the soft culture including the political situation and having flexible mindsets and software and content orientation, this cannot happen.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPMMalay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

Monday, November 26, 2012

REFORM: POSTAL SERVICE

Privatisation will benefit India Post and also uplift the rural economy

Well, before presenting the proposal in detail, let’s take a look at the journey of privatising state-run postal systems in developed countries. Japan realised the need to privatize its state run postal service in 2005. Post office in Japan plays a far more crucial role for the country than just mail handling. It is one of the biggest banks and life insurance companies of Japan. Almost eighty percent households use post office for their banking transactions and two-thirds of Japanese are insured by Japan Post insurance. The state run Japan Post was also in losses like India Post, but after privatisation and inclusion of key financial services, it witnessed growth and profits. Similarly, Deutsche Post and Netherlands Post (more known as TNT) started excelling after bringing corporatisation and professionalism in organisations. They sold a portion of their share in public to raise funds and increase public & private participations but government remained the majority shareholder. Many private delivery companies have bought shares in these erstwhile government owned service providers. It is notable that Deutsche Post and TNT are currently among the biggest postal service providers in the world. Many European countries including Britain, Norway, Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Sweden and Finland have either initiated privatisation or taken the issue into serious consideration.

Coming to India, the vast reach of India Post, especially in rural India, shows plenty of promises for itself as well as for the economy. Indian Post service has also undertaken banking services and insurance but has not been very successful. Through reforms, it can raise funds and through public & private participation, sell a portion of its share to public or any private courier service providers. It needs to be given complete autonomy and should be corporatised completely. It can run its banking and insurance services in a full fledged manner, while keeping its primary operations intact. It’s Postal Savings bank is an example. Unsurprisingly, it has opened and is maintaining over 11 crore accounts with an outstanding balance of Rs.1.55 trillion, almost half of the State Bank of India’s (SBI) turnover.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.